Skip to content
Great news for kids: OSSIOfiber® Metal-Free Compression Screws, Trimmable Fixation Nails, and Compression Staples are now FDA cleared for various bone fractures in children (ages 2-12) and adolescents (ages 12-21). Read More

OSSIOfiber® Compression Screw Fixation for Intercuneiform Instability, in 1st Tarsometatarsal Joint Fusion: A 5-Patient Case Series

← All Posts

Author: Brian Dix, DPM, FACFAS, Avera Orthopedics, Sioux Falls, SD. Dr. Dix was trained at the prestigious Western Pennsylvania Hospital in Pittsburgh, PA. Board certified by the American Board of Podiatric Surgery, in Foot Surgery, Rearfoot Reconstructive Ankle Surgery. 

INTRODUCTION

Hallux valgus is the most common forefoot deformity, with an estimated prevalence of 23% to 35% of population. Choosing the appropriate surgical approach should consider factors such as degree of the deformity and patient clinical symptoms. Lapidus is the preferred procedure for treatment of symptomatic patients with moderate-to-severe deformity. Intercuneiform instability plays an important prognostic role in the Lapidus fixation construct and a potential cause of recurrence. Fleming at el demonstrated that the rate of Intercuneiform instability was 74% in patients treated with Lapidus Arthrodesis. It is believed that stabilization of the Intercuneiform joints as part of Lapidus fusion arthrodesis could be beneficial in controlling the excess motion remaining and conferring additional stability not inherent in this area.1-4

CASE PRESENTATION

This 5-patient case series presents the use of 4.0 OSSIOfiber® Compression Screw (CS) for Intercuneiform instability as part of Lapidus bunionectomy procedure. All patients were female, presented with painful bunion deformity, without significant arthritic changes to the first metatarsal phalangeal (MTP) joint, and all failed conservative treatment. A 1st tarsometatarsal (TMT) joint arthrodesis was discussed and agreed upon by all patients. 

WHY OSSIOfiber® IS AN IDEAL CHOICE?

OSSIOfiber® was chosen to provide stable fixation between the medial and middle cuneiforms after a first TMT joint fusion was performed, as there was Intercuneiform instability confirmed intra-operatively. Using OSSIOfiber® CS provides the desired stabilization while avoiding the use of permanent hardware across the Intercuneiform joint.

Preoperative Planning:

Radiographs of all five patients demonstrated varying degrees of bunion deformity, from moderate to severe, without significant arthritic changes to the 1st TMT joint. All patients had persistent pain and failed conservative treatment. A 1st TMT joint fusion was opted as best treatment option. For one patient an excision of the medial sesamoid was also performed due to painful medial sesamoiditis.

Screen Shot 2022 10 24 At 10.26.59 Am Ossio – Naturally Transformative Bone Healing
Figure 1: Pre-Op X-Rays. AP [A], Lateral [B] & Sesamoid Axial views [C].

Surgical Procedure:

Right 1st TMT joint Fusion with Intercuneiform stabilization.

  • First TMT joint fixation using Lapiplasty 4 holes plates (Treace Medical Concepts Inc.)
  • Intercuneiform fixation using a OSSIOfiber® 4.0x26mm canulated CS

Surgical Technique Steps:

  1. Dissection / Access: Dissection was performed through the same dorsal medial incision which was utilized for the 1st TMT joint fusion.ssection / Access
    – Incision carried down through skin and subcutaneous tissue at the 1st TMT joint.
    – The Extensor Hallucis Longus (EHL) tendon identified with the neurovascular bundle and retracted laterally.
    – A longitudinal capsulotomy was performed at the 1st TMT joint, exposing the joint surface.
    – Joint fusion performed using Lapiplasty 4-hole plates.

    Intercuneiform stabilization:
  2. Fixation Site Preparation:
    – The medial to middle Intercuneiform joint was stressed by the surgeon, confirming Intercuneiform instability on intra operative fluoroscopy.
  3. Tunnel preparation:
    – A K-wire provided in the OSSIOfiber® 4.0 CS instrument kit, was placed from the medial cuneiform to the second cuneiform and position confirmed on fluoroscopy. The dedicated drill bit for the OSSIOfiber® 4.0 CS was then used to create the pilot hole. Pilot hole was then tapped and countersunk.
  4. Implant insertion:
    – An OSSIOfiber® 4.0x26mm headless CS was placed using appropriate technique from the medial cuneiform to the middle cuneiform.
    – Following screw insertion, the joint was stressed again to confirm no widening is noted.
  5. Closure:
    – Subcutaneous 2.0 Vicryl sutures, followed by 4.0 Vicryl Intracuticular and 4.0 Prolene skin sutures.
Screen Shot 2023 01 23 At 10.59.20 Am Ossio – Naturally Transformative Bone Healing
Figure 2: Intra-op stressing of the Intercuneiform joint [A] & Intra-op representative fluoroscopy image demonstrating widening of the first to second intermetatarsal angle, consistent with Intercuneiform instability [B].
Screen Shot 2023 01 23 At 10.59.37 Am Ossio – Naturally Transformative Bone Healing
Figure 3: AP view of the placement of the guide wire to the lateral border of the middle cuneiform for the insertion of a cannulated OSSIOfiber® 4.0mm CS.

* Technique Pearl: Aim dorsal when placing the guide wire from the medial to intermediate cuneiform, as the intermediate cuneiform base is shallow.

Screen Shot 2022 10 24 At 11.00.44 Am Ossio – Naturally Transformative Bone Healing
Figure 4: Preparation for OSSIOfiber® 4.0 CS insertion, all steps performed over the guide wire – Drilling [A]; Tapping [B]; and Countersinking [C].
Screen Shot 2022 10 24 At 11.04.14 Am Ossio – Naturally Transformative Bone Healing
Figure 5: Inserting the OSSIOfiber® 4.0 CS over the guide wire [A]; Screw head fully seated and flush with the bone [B].
Screen Shot 2022 10 24 At 11.07.39 Am Ossio – Naturally Transformative Bone Healing
Figure 6: Representative final intra-operative fluoroscopy – AP view with reduction of the bunion deformity and no widening of the Intercuneiform joint [A]; Lateral view [B].

Post-Operative Protocol:

The use of the OSSIOfiber® CS does not alter the standard post-operative instructions for these patients. Non-weight bearing for the first 2-weeks, followed by full weight bearing in a controlled ankle motion walking boot (CAM boot) for additional 4 weeks. At 6-weeks comfort shoe wear.

Patient Follow-Up:

All patients attended their scheduled follow up visits at 1, 2, 4, 6 & 10- weeks with final visit at 4-months. For all patients, healing progressed as expected, full details as follow:

  • Week 1: Incision healing nicely with moderate post-op erythema. Patients are non-weight bearing.
  • Week 2: Incision has healed nicely after removal of sutures. Mild post op erythema and edema without signs of infection. The great toe is significantly more rectus. Patients can transition to weight bearing in cam boot.
  • Week 4-10: Incision has healed nicely. Local erythema resolved. The great toe is significantly more rectus. X-Rays demonstrate reduction of the bunion deformity with a healing first TMT joint fusion and no intercuneiform instability. Patients transitioned to weight bearing in a good supportive tennis shoe and slowly returned to daily activities.
  • 4 months: The great toe is significantly more rectus. X-rays samples provided below (Figure 7), show reduction of the bunion deformity with a healed first TMT joint fusion and no Intercuneiform instability. Patients returned to all daily activities in normal shoe wear and most are very pleased with the final results.
Screen Shot 2023 01 18 At 1.28.41 Pm Ossio – Naturally Transformative Bone Healing
Figure 7: Weight bearing X-rays in a AP view, for two patients, taken 4-months [A] and 6-months [B] post-operatively; Both X-ray images demonstrate excellent reduction of the bunion deformity with no widening of the Intercuneiform joint.

One patient had her follow-up extend beyond the 4 months visit:

  • Patient imaging demonstrated full healing at 4-months but the patient had some persistent pain at the surgical site, both dorsal and medial, over the metal plates. At 6-months following the procedure, as the patient continued to demonstrate persistent pain, a decision was made to remove the metal hardware. CT scan was performed showing a healed 1st TMT joint with stable intercuneiform joint and OSSIOfiber® 4.0mm screw. A second surgery was performed, and the dorsal and medial metal plates were removed. Following the removal of the metal hardware, clinical signs have resolved.
Screen Shot 2023 01 18 At 1.29.49 Pm Ossio – Naturally Transformative Bone Healing
Figure 8: 6-months CT scan, axial view [A], demonstrating a healed 1st TMT joint with stable Intercouineform fixation, prior to hardware removal; A Fluoroscopy image, taken 1 month following metal hardware removal, showing a healed 1st TMT joint with no intercuneiform widening [B].

Summary:

I chose the OSSIOfiber® 4.0mm cannulated compression screw to address the Intercuneiform instability demonstrated when stressing the Intercuneiform joint following TMT joint plate fusion. I prefer the OSSIOfiber® 4.0mm cannulated screw over a metal screw as I this way I avoid placing permanent hardware across the joint. Furthermore, the screws provide excellent fixation and will not have to be removed in the future as they incorporate within the bone over time.

References

1. The treatment of hallux valgus. Wülker N, Mittag F. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012 Dec;109(49):857-67; quiz 868. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0857.
2. Intraoperative evaluation of medial Intercuneiform instability after Lapidus arthrodesis: Intercuneiform hook test. Fleming JJ, Kwaadu KY, Brinkley JC, Ozuzu Y. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015;54:464–472.
3. Enhanced Lapidus arthrodesis: crossed screw technique with middle cuneiform fixation further reduces sagittal mobility. Galli MM, McAlister JE, Berlet GC, Hyer CF. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015;54:437–440
4. Recurrence of Hallux Valgus After Modified Lapidus Procedure With Successful Fusion of the Intermetatarsal and Intercuneiform Joints. Long J, Lauf JA, Whitehead B, Cheney N, Law TD.. Cureus. 2021 Jun 3;13(6):e15418. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15418. PMID: 34249565; PMCID: PMC8254418.

Medical professionals must use their professional judgment for patient selection and appropriate technique.

Results from case studies are not predictive of results in other cases. Results may vary.

Please refer to the product instructions for use for warnings, precautions, indications, contraindications and technique.

Not available for sale outside of the US. Speak to your local sales representative for product availability.

For more information, please visit ossio.io

® OSSIO and OSSIOfiber® are registered trademarks of OSSIO Ltd.

All rights reserved 2022.

DOC-002300 Rev 1.0

Brian Dix, DPM, FACFAS

Brian Dix, DPM, FACFAS

Brian Dix, DPM, FACFAS, Avera Orthopedics, Sioux Falls, SD. Dr. Dix was trained at the prestigious Western Pennsylvania Hospital in Pittsburgh, PA. Board certified by the American Board of Podiatric Surgery, in Foot Surgery, Rearfoot Reconstructive Ankle Surgery.

Related Posts

All-Natural Modified Lapidus for Severe Hallux Valgus Correction 

Author: Garret Strand, DPM, Shasta Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, CA. INTRODUCTION Hallux Abducto Valgus (HAV) (also referred to as Hallux Valgus (HV) or Bunion) is one of the most common deformities in the foot and ankle field. This pathological condition involves malpositioning of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint, caused by both a medial deviation ofContinue reading “All-Natural Modified Lapidus for Severe Hallux Valgus Correction “

Garret Strand, DPM, Shasta Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, CA. September 5, 2024

Operative Fixation of a Transitional Ankle Fracture in a 14-year-Old Competitive Dancer, Using Bio-Integrative Implants

Author: Michael Morwood, MD, Atlantic Orthopaedics, Portsmouth, NH. INTRODUCTION The epiphyseal plate (known also as physis or growth plate) is a highly organized cartilage structure between the epiphyseal and metaphyseal bone at the distal ends of long bones. Fractures involving the epiphyseal plate are common musculoskeletal injuries occurring in children with open growth plates. PediatricContinue reading “Operative Fixation of a Transitional Ankle Fracture in a 14-year-Old Competitive Dancer, Using Bio-Integrative Implants”

Michael Morwood, MD, Atlantic Orthopaedics, Portsmouth, NH. June 20, 2024

All-Natural OSSIOfiber® Flatfoot Reconstruction

Author: Dallin Greene, DPM, Glendive Medical Center in Glendive, MT. Dr. Dallin Greene is a board-certified Foot and Ankle surgeon, treating all aspects of the foot and ankle with expertise in deformity correction. Dr. Greene graduated from Brigham Young University-Idaho in 2009 with a bachelor’s in biology. He then attended Midwestern University Arizona for aContinue reading “All-Natural OSSIOfiber® Flatfoot Reconstruction”

Dallin Greene April 2, 2024

Interested in OSSIOfiber®?

Complete the form and an OSSIOfiber® Advisor will get in touch.

Customer Service

For product inquiries or purchasing questions contact 833-781-7373 or email info@ossio.io

Address

Commercial Headquarters
OSSIO Inc
300 Tradecenter Drive, Suite 3690
Woburn, MA, 01801

Science & Manufacturing Center

OSSIO Ltd.
8 HaTochen Street
Cesarea, Israel 3079861

OSSIOfiber® has been used by 1500+ surgeons across the US

Footnotes

1. Data on file at OSSIO 2. Clinical study data on file at OSSIO 3. Kaiser, P.B., Watkins, I., Riedel, M. D., Cronin, P., Briceno, J., Kron, J. Y. (2019). Implant Removal Matrix for the Foot and Ankle Orthopaedic Surgeon. Foot & Ankle Specialist, 12(1), 79-97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938640018791015 4. Pre-clinical animal studies (in-bone implantation of OSSIOfiber® and PLDLA control in rabbit femurs). Data on File at OSSIO. 5. Haddad, S. F., Helm, M. M., Meath, B., Adams, C., Packianathan, N., & Uhl, R. (2019). Exploring the Incidence, Implications, and Relevance of Metal Allergy to Orthopaedic Surgeons. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews, 3(4), e023. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-19-00023 6. Pot J, Wensen RV, Olsman J. Hardware Related Pain and Hardware Removal after Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Ankle Fractures. The Foot and Ankle Online Journal. 2011;4(5). doi:10.3827/ faoj.2011.0405.0001.