Skip to content
Great news for kids: OSSIOfiber® Metal-Free Compression Screws and Trimmable Fixation Nails are now FDA cleared for various bone fractures in children (ages 2-12) and adolescents (ages 12-21). Read More

Surgical Case Review: Bilateral Intermetatarsal Stabilization during Lapidus Bunionectomies

← All Posts

Author: Brett D. Sachs, DPM, FACFAS Co-Author: Steven Cooperman, DPM Rocky Mountain Foot and Ankle Center

INTRODUCTION

Hallux abducto-valgus deformities, more commonly known as bunion deformities, are among the most frequent concerns of patients presenting to a foot and ankle clinics. With over 200 reported techniques for surgical correction, there is no lack of options for the treating surgeon when approaching this problem. For cases with first ray hypermobility, arthritic changes, and more severe deformities, the author’s preference is a Lapidus type bunionectomy (a first tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis).

When performing any bunionectomy, recurrence must be considered. A proposed risk factor for a recurrent deformity in Lapidus type bunionectomies is intercuneiform instability. In a study by Fleming in 2015, they found that 74% of their 38 Lapidus procedures had coinciding intercuneiform instability1. The use of an intermetatarsal or intercuneiform screw to prevent rotational and translational forces, which contribute to this instability, is becoming increasingly popular. The goal of this additional screw is to eliminate these forces, potentially lessening the incidence of recurrence. In the presented case, an OSSIOfiber® 4.0mm Compression Screw and a traditional titanium screw were placed from the first metatarsal to the second metatarsal on the left and right feet respectively, with differing results.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 43 years old, female, 5’6”, 195lbs, BMI, 31.47 with no relevant past medical or surgical history presented to clinic for her initial visit complaining of bilateral forefoot pain with bilateral bunion deformities. She reported having the bunions for several years with a gradual increase in pain and deformity more acutely in the last 2-3 years. The patient tried and failed several conservative treatments including wider and more accommodative shoes. On physical exam, she was noted to have a severe bunion deformity bilaterally with hypertrophy of the medial eminence of the first metatarsal head. Hypermobility was identified in both first rays, with normal range of motion in the first metatarsophalangeal joints.

WHY OSSIOfiber® IS AN IDEAL CHOICE FOR THIS PATIENT?

OSSIOfiber®’s high mechanical strength, due to its unique mineral fiber layered architecture and gradual bone integration, are ideal for use as the intermetatarsal screw in a Lapidus fixation construct.

Pre-Op:

Based on the patient’s severe bunion deformity, identified both clinically and radiographically, along with hypermobility of the first ray, Lapidus type bunionectomies were performed on both feet roughly three and a half months apart.

Screen Shot 2022 11 02 At 2.30.51 Pm Ossio – Naturally Transformative Bone Healing

Surgical Technique:

Right 1st TMT joint Fusion with Intercuneiform stabilization.

Right and Left foot Lapidus Bunionectomy with intermetatarsal stabilization.

Concomitant procedure(s):

  1. Second metatarsal shortening osteotomy
  2. Harvest of bone graft and bone marrow aspirate (BMA) from calcaneus

Comments on approach / treatment:

The same procedures were performed on both feet using the same surgical approach and reduction method, though with differing metal hardware.

Implants / Instruments:

Left Foot: OSSIOfiber® Trimmable Fixation Nail (4.0x50mm) was used as adjunct fixation of the 1st/2nd metatarsal
fixation. Intraosseous Lapidus system; two metal compression screws for the 2nd metatarsal osteotomy.
Right Foot: Plate and screw construct with lag screw, 4.5mm cannulated metal screw for the 1st/2nd metatarsal fixation; two metal compression screws for the 2nd metatarsal osteotomy. OSSIOfiber® Trimmable Fixation Nail was used as adjunct fixation

Surgical Technique Details:

  1. Dissection / Access

    (Dissection was identical for both procedures)
    A linear longitudinal incision was made over the first tarsometatarsal joint extending distally to the first metatarsophalangeal joint. The incision was deepened down to the level of the joint and the periosteum was then reflected. A lateral release was also performed.
  2. Fixation site preparation

    Next, a hintermann type distractor was utilized to distract the first tarsometatarsal joint. The joint was then debrided with a combination of curette, osteotome, and rongeur. A 2.0 drill was utilized to fenestrate the subchondral bone and osteotome to fish scale the joint. Bone marrow aspirate (BMA) and cancellous autograft was obtained from the calcaneus. This bone graft mixture was placed across the first tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis site. The frontal plane was reduced and the intermetatarsal angle was reduced with the use of a pelvic reduction clamp. The correction was then maintained with K-wires.
  3. Implant insertion:

    For the left foot, an intraosseous fixation Lapidus system was utilized for the 1st tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis. The first and second rays were stressed under intraoperative real-time fluoroscopy and it was determined that there was intercuneiform instability present. A 4.0mm OSSIOfiber® Trimmable Fixation Nail was then placed from the first metatarsal into the second metatarsal, with no remaining instability noted.
    For the right foot, a 4.5mm lag screw was placed from dorsal-distal to proximal plantar across the fusion site. A medial plate with four locking screws placed. The first and second rays were stressed under intraoperative real-time fluoroscopy and it was determined that there was intercuneiform instability present. Therefore, a metal 4.0mm cannulated screw was placed through the plate from the base of the first metatarsal to the base of the second metatarsal. Following insertion of this screw, there was no remaining instability at this time.
  4. Implant insertion:

    • An OSSIOfiber® 4.0x26mm Compression Screw was placed using appropriate technique from the medial cuneiform to the middle cuneiform.
    • Following screw insertion, the joint was stressed again to confirm no widening is noted.
  5. Closure

    Soft tissue closure was performed in a typical layered fashion. A sterile dressing and posterior splint was applied. The periosteum and capsular structures were closed with 2-0 vicryl.

Technique Tips:

Closure of the intermetatarsal angle is aided by using a pelvic reduction clamp. Additionally, using a single K-wire proximally on the medial aspect of the first metatarsal allows for a frontal plane correction with dorsal force applied to the K-wire.

Post-Op Protocol:

  • Non-weight bearing: Approximately 2 weeks non-weight bearing in posterior splint.
  • Partial weight bearing: At 2-3 weeks, transition to protected weightbearing in CAM boot.
  • Full weight bearing: At 5 weeks, transition into regular shoe gear with progressive full weightbearing as tolerated.

Follow-Up Outcomes:

Since the broken screw is currently asymptomatic, nothing will be done regarding extraction. Both surgeries healed uneventfully and there is normal bone healing.

Screen Shot 2022 11 02 At 3.46.48 Pm Ossio – Naturally Transformative Bone Healing

Summary:

OSSIOfiber® screws are ideal for this intermetatarsal screw due to their inherent strength and stability as well as their integrative properties. As demonstrated in this case, a patient received identical procedures on both feet with differing fixation. The most glaring difference between these two operations and their results is the hardware failure of the intermetatarsal screw on the right foot compared to the intact OSSIOfiber® screw on the left foot. The OSSIOfiber® screw maintained its stability and position beyond the final post-operative period for the left foot, while the traditional fully threaded screw failed within the immediate post-operative period. The benefit of these OSSIOfiber® screws as an intermetatarsal screw is most likely due to their mineral fiber architecture, which allows for resistance to the flexing and bending forces which are inherent to the first intermetatarsal space in a patient with intercuneiform instability.

References

1. Fleming JJ, KwaaduKY, Brinkley JC, OzuzuY. Intraoperative evaluation of medial intercuneiformin stability after Lapidus arthrodesis: intercuneiform hook test. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015; 54(3):464-472.

Disclaimers

DOC-0002337 Rev 01 06/2022
Refer to the product instructions for use for warnings, precautions, indications, contraindications, and complete technique. Medical professionals must use their professional judgment in making any final determinations for product usage and technique.
Results from case studies are not predictive of results in other cases. Results may vary.
Not available for sale outside of the US. Speak to your local sales representative for product availability. OSSIO® and OSSIOfiber® are registered trademarks of OSSIO Ltd. All rights reserved 2022.
For more information, please visit ossio.io

Related Posts

All-Natural OSSIOfiber® Flatfoot Reconstruction

Author: Dallin Greene, DPM, Glendive Medical Center in Glendive, MT. Dr. Dallin Greene is a board-certified Foot and Ankle surgeon, treating all aspects of the foot and ankle with expertise in deformity correction. Dr. Greene graduated from Brigham Young University-Idaho in 2009 with a bachelor’s in biology. He then attended Midwestern University Arizona for aContinue reading “All-Natural OSSIOfiber® Flatfoot Reconstruction”

Dallin Greene April 2, 2024

Midfoot Revision Arthrodesis Using OSSIOfiber® Nail & Screws Following Naviculocuneiform Nonunion

Author: Cody J. Togher, DPM at The Joint Replacement Institute. Dr. Togher is a Fellowship-Trained Foot & Ankle Surgeon at the Joint Replacement Institute in Naples, FL. He completed his residency at AdventHealth East Orlando prior to completing fellowship at the Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Center in Columbus, OH. Dr. Togher specializes in complex footContinue reading “Midfoot Revision Arthrodesis Using OSSIOfiber® Nail & Screws Following Naviculocuneiform Nonunion”

Cody Togher, DPM January 29, 2024

Bilateral Hallux Valgus Correction with All-Natural, Bio-Integrative Lapidus Procedure

Surgeon: Mark A Prissel, DPM FACFAS, Board-Certified, Fellowship Trained Foot & Ankle Surgeon Education/training: Dr. Prissel is a fellowship trained foot and ankle surgeon and partner at The Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Center (OFAC), a practice devoted to multi-disciplinary foot and ankle care in Worthington, Ohio. In addition to his surgical practice, Dr. Prissel currentlyContinue reading “Bilateral Hallux Valgus Correction with All-Natural, Bio-Integrative Lapidus Procedure”

Mark Prissel, DPM November 7, 2023

Interested in OSSIOfiber®?

Complete the form and an OSSIOfiber® Advisor will get in touch.

Customer Service

For product inquiries or purchasing questions contact 833-781-7373 or email info@ossio.io

Address

Commercial Headquarters
OSSIO Inc
300 Tradecenter Drive, Suite 3690
Woburn, MA, 01801

Science & Manufacturing Center

OSSIO Ltd.
8 HaTochen Street
Cesarea, Israel 3079861

OSSIOfiber® has been used by over 900 surgeons across the US

Footnotes

1. Data on file at OSSIO 2. Clinical study data on file at OSSIO 3. Kaiser, P.B., Watkins, I., Riedel, M. D., Cronin, P., Briceno, J., Kron, J. Y. (2019). Implant Removal Matrix for the Foot and Ankle Orthopaedic Surgeon. Foot & Ankle Specialist, 12(1), 79-97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938640018791015 4. Pre-clinical animal studies (in-bone implantation of OSSIOfiber® and PLDLA control in rabbit femurs). Data on File at OSSIO. 5. Haddad, S. F., Helm, M. M., Meath, B., Adams, C., Packianathan, N., & Uhl, R. (2019). Exploring the Incidence, Implications, and Relevance of Metal Allergy to Orthopaedic Surgeons. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews, 3(4), e023. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-19-00023 6. Pot J, Wensen RV, Olsman J. Hardware Related Pain and Hardware Removal after Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Ankle Fractures. The Foot and Ankle Online Journal. 2011;4(5). doi:10.3827/ faoj.2011.0405.0001.